Refactor to enforce strictNullChecks
This commit applies `strictNullChecks` to the entire codebase to improve maintainability and type safety. Key changes include: - Remove some explicit null-checks where unnecessary. - Add necessary null-checks. - Refactor static factory functions for a more functional approach. - Improve some test names and contexts for better debugging. - Add unit tests for any additional logic introduced. - Refactor `createPositionFromRegexFullMatch` to its own function as the logic is reused. - Prefer `find` prefix on functions that may return `undefined` and `get` prefix for those that always return a value.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,21 +1,10 @@
|
||||
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
|
||||
import { parseFunctionCalls } from '@/application/Parser/Script/Compiler/Function/Call/FunctionCallParser';
|
||||
import { FunctionCallDataStub } from '@tests/unit/shared/Stubs/FunctionCallDataStub';
|
||||
import { itEachAbsentObjectValue, itEachAbsentStringValue } from '@tests/unit/shared/TestCases/AbsentTests';
|
||||
import { itEachAbsentStringValue } from '@tests/unit/shared/TestCases/AbsentTests';
|
||||
|
||||
describe('FunctionCallParser', () => {
|
||||
describe('parseFunctionCalls', () => {
|
||||
describe('throws with missing call data', () => {
|
||||
itEachAbsentObjectValue((absentValue) => {
|
||||
// arrange
|
||||
const expectedError = 'missing call data';
|
||||
const call = absentValue;
|
||||
// act
|
||||
const act = () => parseFunctionCalls(call);
|
||||
// assert
|
||||
expect(act).to.throw(expectedError);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
it('throws if call is not an object', () => {
|
||||
// arrange
|
||||
const expectedError = 'called function(s) must be an object';
|
||||
@@ -27,20 +16,6 @@ describe('FunctionCallParser', () => {
|
||||
expect(act).to.throw(expectedError);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
describe('throws if call sequence has undefined call', () => {
|
||||
itEachAbsentObjectValue((absentValue) => {
|
||||
// arrange
|
||||
const expectedError = 'missing call data';
|
||||
const data = [
|
||||
new FunctionCallDataStub(),
|
||||
absentValue,
|
||||
];
|
||||
// act
|
||||
const act = () => parseFunctionCalls(data);
|
||||
// assert
|
||||
expect(act).to.throw(expectedError);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
describe('throws if call sequence has undefined function name', () => {
|
||||
itEachAbsentStringValue((absentValue) => {
|
||||
// arrange
|
||||
@@ -53,7 +28,7 @@ describe('FunctionCallParser', () => {
|
||||
const act = () => parseFunctionCalls(data);
|
||||
// assert
|
||||
expect(act).to.throw(expectedError);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}, { excludeNull: true, excludeUndefined: true });
|
||||
});
|
||||
it('parses single call as expected', () => {
|
||||
// arrange
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user