44r0n7/privacy.sexy
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix failing of functions without revert code

Browse Source 
Add missing empty/undefined handling to fix a bug where defining new
functions without `revertCode:` fails.
This commit is contained in:
undergroundwires
2021-12-21 06:01:16 +01:00
parent 5a2c263af3
commit 87de017afd
5 changed files with 61 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

36
tests/unit/application/Parser/Script/Compiler/Expressions/ExpressionsCompiler.spec.ts
View File

@@ -8,6 +8,28 @@ import { FunctionCallArgumentCollectionStub } from '@tests/unit/stubs/FunctionCa
describe('ExpressionsCompiler', () => {
describe('compileExpressions', () => {
describe('returns code when it is empty or undefined', () => {
// arrange
const testCases = [{
name: 'empty',
value: '',
}, {
name: 'undefined',
value: undefined,
},
];
for (const test of testCases) {
it(`given ${test.name}`, () => {
const expected = test.value;
const sut = new SystemUnderTest();
const args = new FunctionCallArgumentCollectionStub();
// act
const value = sut.compileExpressions(test.value, args);
// assert
expect(value).to.equal(expected);
});
}
});
describe('combines expressions as expected', () => {
// arrange
const code = 'part1 {{ a }} part2 {{ b }} part3';
@@ -49,7 +71,7 @@ describe('ExpressionsCompiler', () => {
const expressionParserMock = new ExpressionParserStub()
.withResult(testCase.expressions);
const args = new FunctionCallArgumentCollectionStub();
const sut = new MockableExpressionsCompiler(expressionParserMock);
const sut = new SystemUnderTest(expressionParserMock);
// act
const actual = sut.compileExpressions(code, args);
// assert
@@ -69,7 +91,7 @@ describe('ExpressionsCompiler', () => {
];
const expressionParserMock = new ExpressionParserStub()
.withResult(expressions);
const sut = new MockableExpressionsCompiler(expressionParserMock);
const sut = new SystemUnderTest(expressionParserMock);
// act
sut.compileExpressions(code, expected);
// assert
@@ -83,7 +105,7 @@ describe('ExpressionsCompiler', () => {
const expectedError = 'undefined args, send empty collection instead';
const args = undefined;
const expressionParserMock = new ExpressionParserStub();
const sut = new MockableExpressionsCompiler(expressionParserMock);
const sut = new SystemUnderTest(expressionParserMock);
// act
const act = () => sut.compileExpressions('code', args);
// assert
@@ -135,7 +157,7 @@ describe('ExpressionsCompiler', () => {
const code = 'non-important-code';
const expressionParserMock = new ExpressionParserStub()
.withResult(testCase.expressions);
const sut = new MockableExpressionsCompiler(expressionParserMock);
const sut = new SystemUnderTest(expressionParserMock);
// act
const act = () => sut.compileExpressions(code, testCase.args);
// assert
@@ -147,7 +169,7 @@ describe('ExpressionsCompiler', () => {
// arrange
const expected = 'expected-code';
const expressionParserMock = new ExpressionParserStub();
const sut = new MockableExpressionsCompiler(expressionParserMock);
const sut = new SystemUnderTest(expressionParserMock);
const args = new FunctionCallArgumentCollectionStub();
// act
sut.compileExpressions(expected, args);
@@ -158,8 +180,8 @@ describe('ExpressionsCompiler', () => {
});
});
class MockableExpressionsCompiler extends ExpressionsCompiler {
constructor(extractor: IExpressionParser) {
class SystemUnderTest extends ExpressionsCompiler {
constructor(extractor: IExpressionParser = new ExpressionParserStub()) {
super(extractor);
}
}