Fix compiler bug with nested optional arguments

This commit fixes compiler bug where it fails when optional values are
compiled into absent values in nested calls.

- Throw exception with more context for easier future debugging.
- Add better validation of argument values for nested calls.
- Refactor `FunctionCallCompiler` for better clarity and modularize it
  to make it more maintainable and testable.
- Refactor related interface to not have `I` prefix, and
  function/variable names for better clarity.

Context:

Discovered this issue while attempting to call
`RunInlineCodeAsTrustedInstaller` which in turn invokes `RunPowerShell`
for issue #246. This led to the realization that despite parameters
flagged as optional, the nested argument compilation didn't support
them.
This commit is contained in:
undergroundwires
2023-09-16 16:11:41 +02:00
parent a1f2497381
commit 53222fd83c
49 changed files with 1938 additions and 772 deletions

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { describe, it } from 'vitest';
import { NodeDataError, INodeDataErrorContext } from '@/application/Parser/NodeValidation/NodeDataError';
import { NodeData } from '@/application/Parser/NodeValidation/NodeData';
import { getAbsentObjectTestCases, getAbsentStringTestCases, itEachAbsentTestCase } from '@tests/unit/shared/TestCases/AbsentTests';
import { expectThrowsError } from '@tests/unit/shared/Assertions/ExpectThrowsError';
import { expectDeepThrowsError } from '@tests/unit/shared/Assertions/ExpectDeepThrowsError';
export interface ITestScenario {
readonly act: () => void;
@@ -82,6 +82,6 @@ export function expectThrowsNodeError(
// act
const act = () => test.act();
// assert
expectThrowsError(act, expected);
expectDeepThrowsError(act, expected);
return this;
}